This blog is written as a task assigned by the head of the Department of English (MKBU), Prof. and Dr. Dilip Barad Sir.
Here is the link to the blog: Click here.
Video: 1 : Definition
- Why is it difficult to define Deconstruction?
- Is Deconstruction a negative term?
- How does Deconstruction happen on its own?
1. Why is it difficult to define Deconstruction?
It is difficult to define deconstruction because, according to Derrida, definitions themselves are inherently limited and provisional. He questions whether any concept can be definitively and conclusively defined. This uncertainty makes it challenging to pin down deconstruction in a fixed, clear-cut manner.
2. Is Deconstruction a negative term?
No, deconstruction is not a negative term. While it is often misunderstood as being destructive, Derrida emphasizes that deconstruction is not about tearing things down for its own sake. Instead, it is a critical inquiry into the underlying assumptions, contradictions, and limitations of philosophical and intellectual systems. It aims to understand how these systems are built—and how their foundations may also contain the potential for their own undoing. Thus, deconstruction is constructive in its questioning, not simply negative.
3. How does Deconstruction happen on its own?
Deconstruction happens on its own because every system has built-in contradictions. Derrida shows that meaning is never fixed—it’s always shifting and unstable. So, systems naturally deconstruct themselves over time without outside force.
Video: 2 : Heideggar
- The influence of Heidegger on Derrida
- Derridean rethinking of the foundations of Western philosophy
1. The influence of Heidegger on Derrida
Heidegger influenced Derrida by questioning how Western philosophy ignores how things exist. Derrida built on this by focusing on language, especially how meaning is shaped. He extended Heidegger’s ideas through deconstruction, shifting emphasis from speech to writing and critiquing the bias in Western thought.
2. Derridean rethinking of the foundations of Western philosophy
Derrida rethinks the foundations of Western philosophy by challenging its core assumptions, especially the belief in fixed meanings and binary oppositions. He critiques the tradition's preference for speech over writing (phonocentrism) and shows that meaning is always unstable and deferred (différance). Through deconstruction, Derrida exposes the hidden contradictions in philosophical systems, urging a more flexible, self-critical approach to knowledge.
Video : 3 : Ferdinand de Saussure
- Ferdinand de Saussureian concept of language (that meaning is arbitrary, relational, constitutive)
- How Derrida deconstructs the idea of arbitrariness?
- Concept of metaphysics of presence
1. Ferdinand de Saussureian concept of language (that meaning is arbitrary, relational, constitutive)
Ferdinand de Saussure’s concept of language shows that meaning is arbitrary, as the link between words and meanings is based on social convention, not nature. It is also relational, since words gain meaning only through their difference from other words. Finally, meaning is constitutive, as language actively shapes and produces meaning rather than merely reflecting it.
2. How Derrida deconstructs the idea of arbitrariness?
Derrida deconstructs Saussure’s idea of arbitrariness by showing that meaning is not just arbitrary but also unstable and endlessly deferred. He argues that words don’t have fixed meanings because each word gains meaning only through its difference from others—what he calls “différance.” This means meaning is never fully present or final; it’s always shifting within a chain of signs.
3. Concept of metaphysics of presence
The metaphysics of presence is a concept critiqued by Heidegger and Derrida. It refers to the Western philosophical belief that truth, meaning, or being must be immediately present—something directly accessible, stable, and fully knowable. Derrida challenges this idea, showing that meaning is never fully present but always deferred through language, and shaped by absence as much as presence.
Video : 4 : DifferAnce
- Derridean concept of DifferAnce
- Infinite play of meaning
- DIfferAnce = to differ + to defer
1. Derridean concept of DifferAnce
Derridean concept of difference refers to how meaning in language is both deferred and differentiated. Derrida argues that we never reach a final meaning because each word relies on other words for its definition, creating an endless chain. Différance challenges the idea of stable meaning and shows that understanding is always incomplete.
2. Infinite play of meaning
Infinite play of meaning refers to Derrida’s idea that meaning is never fixed or final. Instead, it is always shifting, as each word gains meaning only through its differences from other words, which themselves need further words to be defined. This creates an endless chain where meaning is constantly deferred, making it fluid and unstable—an infinite play.
3. DIfferAnce = to differ + to defer
Différance = to differ + to defer
Derrida combines these two meanings:
To differ: Meaning comes from how words are different from each other.
To defer: Meaning is always postponed, never fully present or complete.
This blend shows that meaning is both relational and never final, which is central to Derrida’s theory of différance.
Video : 5 : Structure, Sign & Play
- Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences
- Explain: "Language bears within itself the necessity of its own critique.
1. Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences
“Structure, Sign, and Play” marks Derrida’s move from structuralism to post-structuralism. He argues that structures rely on a center, but this center is unstable because meaning is always deferred (difference). As a result, meaning is always in “free play”, and no interpretation is ever final. The essay shows that language is unstable, and critique must also question itself.
2. Explain: "Language bears within itself the necessity of its own critique.
Language must critique itself because it never gives fixed meaning. Since all meaning is deferred and unstable, any idea expressed in language is also open to question. So, language always carries its own critique within it.
Video : 6 : Yale School
- The Yale School: the hub of the practitioners of Deconstruction in the literary theories
- The characteristics of the Yale School of Deconstruction
1. The Yale School: the hub of the practitioners of Deconstruction in the literary theories
The Yale School became the hub for deconstruction in literary theory during the 1970s. Key figures like Paul de Man, J. Hillis Miller, Harold Bloom, and Geoffrey Hartman brought Derrida’s ideas from philosophy into literary criticism, showing how language’s instability leads to multiple, undecidable interpretations of texts.
2. The characteristics of the Yale School of Deconstruction
Characteristics of the Yale School of Deconstruction (as per the video):
Close Reading – The Yale critics practiced intense, detailed analysis of literary texts to uncover hidden tensions and contradictions within the language.
Textual Self-Deconstruction – They believed that texts often undermine their own claims. Through close reading, they revealed how texts deconstruct themselves, exposing internal contradictions.
Instability of Meaning – Meaning is seen as fluid and shifting, not fixed. Language doesn’t deliver stable truth, leading to multiple, undecidable interpretations.
Video : 7 : Influence on other critical theories
How other schools like New Historicism, Cultural Materialism, Feminism, Marxism and Postcolonial theorists used Deconstruction?
Many critical theories use deconstruction to expose hidden power in texts. New Historicism and Cultural Materialism show how language reflects history and ideology. Feminism breaks gender binaries, Marxism reveals class conflict, and Postcolonial theory challenges colonial narratives. All use deconstruction to question fixed meanings and reveal deeper tensions.
Thank You!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment