Unit 2 - Plagiarism and Academic Integrity

This assignment has been assigned by Prakruti Ma’am as part of the 'Research Methodology' course, specifically from Unit 2 - Plagiarism and Academic Integrity. Students were instructed to read the chapter thoroughly, prepare comprehensive notes, and articulate their understanding in their own words while responding to selected questions from the question bank prescribed in the syllabus. The primary objective of this task is to cultivate a clear and critical understanding of the chapter’s core concepts and to demonstrate the ability to analyze, interpret, and present them effectively in both long and short answer formats.

List at least five key concepts highlighted within this chapter. You can mention them as bullet points.

1. Definition of Plagiarism: Plagiarism is defined as using another person's ideas or expressions in your writing without acknowledging the source.

2. Serious Consequences: Academic institutions and professional organizations view plagiarism as a grave offense.

3. Unintentional Plagiarism: Plagiarism is not always a deliberate act of cheating

4.Forms of Plagiarism:

•    Repeating another's wording without using quotation marks.
•    Paraphrasing a source (restating it in your own words) without providing a citation.
•    Presenting another person’s original ideas or line of thinking as your own.

5. When Documentation is Not Needed: A key aspect of academic integrity is knowing when you don't need to cite a source. Documentation is generally not required for "common knowledge"—facts that can be found in numerous places and are likely known by many people.

Define in your own words one important term used in this chapter. For example, if you finished reading chapter 1, define one of these terms: research, academic writing, primary and secondary sources, etc.

In the context of academic integrity, common knowledge refers to information that is so widely known and accepted that it does not require a citation to a specific source. While most facts and ideas in a research paper must be documented to give credit to the original creator, common knowledge is the exception to this rule.

Widespread Facts: These are historical or biographical facts that can be found in numerous reference works and are generally known by many people, such as the fact that George Washington was the first president of the United States.

Shared Information in a Field: If you are writing for a specific professional or academic audience, certain technical information may be considered common knowledge within that specific group, even if the general public wouldn't know it.

Long Question :

How to know Plagiarism and how to avoid it. Explain.  

To understand what plagiarism is and how to avoid it, one must look at the principles of academic integrity as outlined in Chapter 2 of the MLA Handbook. Plagiarism is a serious issue that goes beyond simple "cheating"; it is a fundamental violation of the intellectual honesty that sustains the academic community.

Understanding Plagiarism: How to Know It

Plagiarism is defined as the act of using another person's ideas or expressions in your writing without giving them proper credit. It is essentially intellectual theft because it gives the false impression that you are the original creator of the material.

1. Forms of Plagiarism

You can identify plagiarism by looking for these common forms:

1. Direct Word-for-Word Copying: Taking exact sentences or phrases from a source and putting them into your paper without using quotation marks or providing a citation.
2. Uncredited Paraphrasing: Restating someone else's idea in your own words but failing to mention where the original idea came from.
3. Borrowing an Original Idea: Presenting a unique theory, line of thinking, or argument as your own, even if you don't use the original author's exact words. 
4. Mosaic Plagiarism (Patchwriting): Mixing your own words with bits and pieces of a source without clear attribution.

2. Unintentional Plagiarism

It is important to know that plagiarism is not always a deliberate attempt to deceive. Many students plagiarize by accident due to:

1. Poor Note-Taking: Failing to record which ideas in your notes are your own and which belong to a source.
2. Lack of Tracking: Forgetting to write down the page numbers or publication details of a source while doing research.
3. Misunderstanding Paraphrasing: Thinking that changing a few words in a sentence makes the idea "yours" when it still belongs to the original author.

How to Avoid Plagiarism

Avoiding plagiarism requires a disciplined approach to research and writing. The MLA Handbook emphasizes that the primary goal of documentation is to allow readers to trace your research path and give credit where it is due.

1. Practice Meticulous Note-Taking

The foundation of avoiding plagiarism is laid during the research phase, not the writing phase.

• Clearly Mark Quotations: In your research notes, always put quotation marks around any text you copy directly so you don't mistake it for your own summary later.
• Record Source Details Immediately: As soon as you find a useful source, add it to your "working bibliography" with full publication details and the page numbers for specific ideas.

2. Use Proper Citation and Quotation Marks

When you use a source in your final draft:

• For Direct Quotes: Use quotation marks for any wording that is not your own and provide a parenthetical citation.
• For Paraphrases/Summaries: Even when you put an idea into your own words, you must provide a citation to show the reader the origin of that thought.

3. Know When Documentation is NOT Needed

You do not need to cite common knowledge. This includes facts that can be found in many different places and are likely known by many people (e.g., "The Earth revolves around the Sun"). However, if you are in doubt about whether something is common knowledge, it is always safer to provide a citation.

4. Understand the Consequences

Maintaining integrity is easier when you understand the stakes. Plagiarism can lead to:

• Academic Penalties: Failing grades, suspension, or expulsion from your institution.
• Professional Damage: Loss of reputation, job termination, or legal action in cases of copyright infringement.

Summary of Academic Integrity

Ultimately, avoiding plagiarism is about being an honest communicator. By carefully tracking your sources and consistently using MLA style for citations, you demonstrate respect for the intellectual work of others and build your own credibility as a researcher.

Short Question

When Documentation is not needed.

In academic writing, the general rule is to document everything you borrow, including direct quotations, paraphrases, specific information, and original ideas. However, there are specific instances where documentation is not required. According to Chapter 2 of the MLA Handbook, documentation is generally not needed for common knowledge and certain other specific types of information.

1. Common Knowledge

The most significant exception to the rule of citation is common knowledge. This refers to information that is widely available in numerous sources and is likely known by a large number of people. Because this information is considered public property, no single author can claim ownership of it.

• Widespread Facts: Historical dates, biographical facts, and geographical information that can be found in any standard reference work do not require citation. For example, you do not need to cite a source to state that George Washington was the first president of the United States or that the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776.

• Scientific Truths: Generally accepted scientific facts, such as the fact that the Earth revolves around the sun or that water freezes at 32 degrees Fahrenheit, are considered common knowledge.

• Folklore and Common Sayings: Traditional proverbs, nursery rhymes, and myths that have been passed down through generations and do not have a specific known author usually do not require documentation.

2. Field-Specific Common Knowledge

What is considered "common knowledge" can change depending on your audience. If you are writing for a specialized professional or academic group, certain facts that are basic to that field may not need a citation, even if a general reader would not know them.

• For instance, a paper written for a group of biologists might not need to cite the definition of "mitosis," as it is foundational knowledge within that discipline.

3. Your Own Original Thoughts

You never need to cite yourself for original ideas, personal observations, or conclusions that you have reached through your own independent research and reasoning.

• Personal Experiences: Descriptions of your own life experiences or original insights gained through your own experimentation do not require documentation.

• Original Evaluations: When you analyze a text or a set of data and come to your own unique conclusion, that conclusion is yours and does not require a citation.

4. Scriptural Writings and Public Documents

While the MLA Handbook specifies how to format these in a Works Cited list if you use a specific edition, the general names of these works are often treated differently in the text:

• Scripture: You do not need to italicize or use quotation marks for the names of scriptural writings like the Bible, Old Testament, Genesis, or the Koran when referring to them generally.

• Laws and Acts: The titles of laws, acts, and similar political documents (such as the Magna Carta) are generally not italicized or enclosed in quotation marks and often do not require a citation if you are merely mentioning them by name.

When in Doubt: Cite It

The MLA Handbook offers a crucial piece of advice: if you are ever unsure whether a piece of information qualifies as common knowledge, it is always better to provide a citation. Over-documentation is a minor stylistic flaw, but under-documentation can lead to accusations of plagiarism, which carries far more severe consequences.

Summary Table: To Cite or Not to Cite

Category	Documentation Needed?	Examples
Direct Quotes	Yes	"To be or not to be..."
Paraphrased Ideas	Yes	Summarizing a critic's argument.
Unique Theories	Yes	Einstein's Theory of Relativity.
Widespread Facts	No	The date of World War II's end.
Field-Specific Basics	No (for specialists)	The chemical formula for water (H2O).
Your Own Insights	No	Your personal reaction to a poem.

By understanding these exceptions, you can ensure that your writing is both academically rigorous and appropriately streamlined, focusing your citations on the unique contributions of the researchers whose work you are synthesizing.

Sources for Refer :

Presentation:

Video:

Reference:

Modern Language Association. MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. 7th ed., New York : The Modern Language Association of America, 2009, archive.org/details/mlahandbookforwr0007unse_r3l1 .